What are They spraying in our skies?

A Skeptical History, Global Escalation, and

Urgent Call for Accountability

A Four-Part Mini-Series

BY: GREG TAYLOR with Mary Otto-Chang, HBA,MES,PhD (Candidate)

Part One – A Skeptical History

From Conspiracy Theory to Emerging Fact

The six-month lag persists, and the war for minds rages on. The line between conspiracy theory and conspiracy fact is shrinking, now averaging about six months. For years, the notion of “chemtrails” was ridiculed as fringe paranoia, dismissed as mere water vapor trailing from jet engines. But that narrative is collapsing.

Geoengineering has moved from speculative fiction to operational reality.

Governments are now openly funding geoengineering programs that involve dispersing chemicals, many of them toxic, into the atmosphere. Aerial spraying, over cities, rural zones, and wildlands has surged, yet the scientific rationale behind these interventions remains deeply flawed. The environmental consequences are mounting, with staggering human rights losses.

Their goal: to spray trillions of salt particles into the atmosphere, brightening marine clouds to reflect sunlight away from Earth. The experiment was deliberately kept quiet to avoid public backlash. As Smithsonian Magazine reported, “Leading an experiment that was intentionally kept under the radar to minimize public backlash, the team started up a high-powered spraying machine and shot microscopic salt aerosol particles hundreds of feet into the morning air.” When pressed by The New York Times, the Biden Administration denied involvement, stating, “The U.S. government is not involved in the Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) experiment taking place in Alameda, CA, or anywhere else.” But who funded the project? Who authorized it? The idea that the federal government was unaware strains credulity.

And here’s the astonishing core: What if the climate anomalies we’re told are caused by CO₂, heat waves flipping into blizzards, droughts erupting into floods, ocean currents grinding to a halt, are not just the result of emissions, but engineered disruptions from decades of covert atmospheric spraying?

Dane Wigington, lead researcher at GeoengineeringWatch.org and Director of the documentary “The Dimming”, argues that aerosol injections have already reduced incoming solar radiation by 20–30% since the 1960s, a phenomenon known as global dimming, destabilizing weather systems and accelerating ecological collapse. His film, backed by lab tests, satellite imagery, and declassified documents, warns of imminent global collapse unless spraying halts.

These reports challenge exaggerated tipping points and highlight overlooked adaptation strategies, yet they’re treated as nonexistent, just as Big Pharma dismissed vaccine side effects.

Climate science today feels less like education and more like psychological warfare. Consensus, once a marker of stability, now crumbles under scrutiny. Geoengineering demands a similar reckoning. In this context skepticism regarding the government, mainstream media and scientist orthodoxy isn’t denial, it’s the scalpel we use to carve truth from institutional lies.

To unmask this war for minds, start at the beginning, where verifiable sins birthed unverified shadows.

Historical Context: Verifiable Interventions vs. Unverified Shadows

The Cover-Up Legacy Exposed

To understand the gravity of today’s revelations, we must trace geoengineering’s roots, from wartime necessity to peacetime ambition, and contrast documented experiments with the shadows that fuel suspicion. This isn’t a story of sudden conspiracy; it’s a slow, deliberate march of technology, often cloaked in secrecy, where early successes justified escalation without public consent.

The official narrative remains a fortress of denial, where Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) admissions and DARPA’s classified research are memory-holed, leaving the public bewildered as reality warps around them.

The modern weather modification era began in the 1940s. In 1946, Vincent Schaefer discovered that dry ice could induce precipitation, leading to Project Cirrus in 1947, which attempted hurricane seeding. Declassified logs confirm the experiment, but the storm’s sudden veer toward Georgia sparked concerns about unintended consequences.

The 1950s and 1960s saw weaponization. Operation Popeye (1967–1972) seeded monsoons over Vietnam to wash out enemy supply lines. Air Force pilot Ben Livingston, in a 2012 interview, described flares turning clouds into deluges: “Washed out everything…”

Though Congress was briefed in 1972, denials persisted. CIA documents confirm seeding over Laos for military purposes, yet today’s media insists weather weaponization is a myth. Wigington links these tactics to modern “zonal flow manipulation,” engineering droughts and floods, patterns visible in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA’s) own seeding reports, yet dismissed as natural chaos.

Project Skywater (1962–1988) increased snowfall in the Rockies by 5–15%, but Government Audit Office audits flagged inconsistencies. Wigington’s rainwater tests show aluminum, strontium and barium spikes correlating with jet trails, evidence of a “global poisoning” the IPCC refuses to acknowledge.

From the 1970s to the 1990s, the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, or ENMOD, a landmark United Nations treaty adopted in 1976, banned hostile weather modification, but covert programs continued. President LBJ’s 1965 aerosol proposal laid the groundwork for Solar Radiation Management. Paul Crutzen’s 2006 Pinatubo analogy revived it with his suggestion to deliberately inject sulfur dioxide (SO₂) or sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere to mimic the natural cooling effect of the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines.

To Be Continued.

THANK YOU for your interest in all we do. At No2Globalism.com, we strive to present robust, evidenced-based articles, well sourced with credible resources. As such, an informed and intelligent presentation of facts, requires articles of more than a few hundred words or videos of only several minutes in length.

Along with our usual newsletters and mini-series, segmented into several parts, presented weekly and each a five minute or less read with eye catching images and a reader friendly style, we are now offering something new.

Starting with this mini-series coverage of a critically urgent topic – that of Chemtrails – No2Globalism.com will be presenting this same information, only available as an audio reading, segmented into the same parts as the mini series and playable also in one session.

Take Action

Inform – Gather – Act

We are The People and We direct our governments.

Join Together-Today

republic.us

Sources:

California city votes to block solar geoengineering experiment – POLITICO

Alameda nixes climate geoengineering experiment to test technology that could mitigate

global warming – CBS San Francisco

https://alamedapost.com/news/council-votes-unanimously-end-climate-experiment/

Main-home

Steve Milloy on X – @junkscience

Bjorn Lomborg on X – @bjornlomborg

https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hurricane_blog/70th-anniversary-of-the-first-hurricane-

seeding-experiment/

https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/benchmarks-october-13-1947-disaster-project-

cirrus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye

https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hrd_sub/sfury.html

https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-

1&chapter=26&clang=_en

https://archive.org/details/crutzen2006articlealbedoenhancementbystratospher

https://ia601605.us.archive.org/35/items/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/WeatherAsAForce

Multiplier.pdf

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-

geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis?_hsenc=p2ANqtz_Q8qXK8NU5TwSaenh9JYQnl2uF0soFeabX661yn9jIZIeMK-Q37TykOJs-

C3SvNpwUmS4O

https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hurricane_blog/30th-anniversary-of-project-stormfury-evaluation-article/